Re: AmigaOne X5000
Al Zick <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:20:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Frank, Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I was installing NetBSD on some servers at a data center about 7 hours away. On Mar 4, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Frank Wille wrote: > Al Zick wrote: > >> The AmigaOne X5000 is out! In fact, I have one. It seems fast, but >> AmigaOS doesn't give it much of a work out. >> [...] The author of this article believe like me that >> NetBSD needs to be ported to the new PowerPC system. There must be >> someone who can port to this system. > > Amiga/68k is probably the wrong mailing list, so I added port-powerpc. You're right, I just didn't think anyone else would listen. > The X5000 has a P5020, which is BookE e500mc. AFAIK we already > support e500, > so it might be not too difficult to add. The situation here looks a > bit > better than with the SAM 440/460, which are still lacking 440- > support in > NetBSD (not mentioning the AmigaOne X1000 with its strange PA-Semi > CPU). So, this sounds much more doable. > Then there is also the Tabor A1222 with P1022 CPU (as I understand > this is a > plain e500 core, which is already supported), which is about to > appear. This even sounds more promising. > I might be interested in working on a port, but I would need to buy > any of > the new hardware models first, which is most difficult because of > space > problems. ;) I think I may have found someone who would be willing to donate a motherboard to a developer who can port NetBSD to it. If space is a problem, then I am not sure how this would work. > So I am most interested in the new PPC notebook from ACube Systems, > which > may be using a T2080 CPU (e6500 core). I would really like to get one of these too. My G3 powerbook with the G4 (550 MHz) upgrade is really showing its age. > -- > Frank Wille What can be done to get things started? Since we already have support for the e500 I would be interested in trying to boot a kernel to see how far it gets. Which kernel would you suggest? Is there any hope of it booting, but only using one core? Kind Regards, Al