Re: Installing 2.0.2 onto IBM 7248-100
Andy Ruhl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.prep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/28/05, Jochen Kunz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:52:41 -0700 Andy Ruhl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Somehow when I originally did fdisk and disklabel, my "a" partition > > started from the front of the disk which is no good. I guess you need > > to pay special attention on these when you do your fdisk and disklabel > > partitioning? It all seems kind of hokey the way it works compared to > > other ports, but it's working so I can't complain too much. > port-prep has not that much users so not that much bugreports and bugfixes get back... Most users stumble over the first installation but when they finaly got a running system the system keeps running and running... I can open a bug report. Are we saying that the disklabel on prep should behave like the others where "c" is the NetBSD part of the disk and "d" is the entire disk? > > The obvious question is, can we get a bootloader which understands how > > to go to the proper root disk instead of putting a kernel at the front > > of the disk and hacking around with the fdisk partitions every time we > > want a new kernel? That would be really nice... > I suspect the bigest problem with this is to find someone with the time and motivation to do this. Technically this should be no real problem. Don't forget skill... I have motivation but not too much time. But if I had the skill, I would start working on it. I'm not a C coder, unfortunately. Thanks for your help. I've started writing a post to the list that should clear up some questions about some of this stuff. Andy