Re: No maintainer?
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:37:27 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.prep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 7, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Ulrich Teichert <[email protected]> wrot= e: >> I don=E2=80=99t know anything about maintainers, but I have tried to get N= etBSD >> installed on a 43p-150 without success, and am wondering if perhaps your >> patch will help. :) >=20 > Well, I surely hope so, so please try it out :-) Once it=E2=80=99s in a -current ISO, I=E2=80=99ll give it a shot! >> Maybe it=E2=80=99d be worth engaging one of the maintainers for other Pow= erPC ports? I=E2=80=99ve been thinking about this; would it make sense to merge the list= s for the PowerPC-architecture ports under port-powerpc like the MIPS ports h= ave been merged under port-mips? The system-specific ports still have separate distributions since all the sy= stems boot differently and may require different tweaks as a result, of cour= se. However, having one primary architecture list may help ensure there=E2=80= =99s a critical mass of people who can look at and respond to anything someo= ne brings up, even if it=E2=80=99s not directly related to the system they=E2= =80=99re using. =E2=80=94 Chris