Re: Problems on TS-101
Frank Wille <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:51:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sandpoint |
|---|---|
| Organization | Privates Internet Ostwestfalen/Lippe e.V. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:22:24 +0200 Oscar Molin <[email protected]> wrote: > I just have my synology. Oh, I thought you had a QNAP - I mixed that. > Do you have any machine where you can test altboot.img written to > flash? That's the only difference between us. Is there a reason to use altboot.img? A Synology should be happy with a plain altboot.bin. Loading altboot from flash, via kermit-protocol or tftp should make no difference. But maybe it does on your hardware? I don't understand that. > What's your guess? Is altboot overwriting its own memory space? No. Now I'm convinced we have a compiler problem. After compiling the current altboot source with gcc 4.1.3 (which was the default compiler before August) it starts working again for me! Please try it yourself: ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/phx/sandpoint/altboot_gcc413.bin.gz -- Frank Wille