Re: Enhanced Synology CS/RS support
Frank Wille <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:17:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sandpoint |
|---|---|
| Organization | Privates Internet Ostwestfalen/Lippe |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:26:27 +0100 David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] and the performance difference > between a 3 or 5 drive RAID5 and a 4 drive RAID5, at least on > RAIDframe can be massive. Interesting. I didn't know that. Then the difference would be even bigger on a NAS with a weak MPC8245 CPU. > I'm currently using a couple of HP microservers with 5*2TB disks under > NetBSD/amd64, but I'm always on the lookout for something neater :) > > Actually - 5 or more would work for me, though for an 8 I'd probably > end up using a 5 + 3... QNAP makes nice NAS. I would recommend something like a QNAP TS-509Pro or a TS-559Pro. Both are x86-based (Celeron and Atom), but I don't know how well NetBSD would work on it. -- Frank Wille