Re: QNAP TS 101 as sane- server -problem
Frank Wille <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:27:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sandpoint |
|---|---|
| Organization | Privates Internet Ostwestfalen/Lippe |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:05:48 +0000 Helge Muehlmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to use this device as scanner-server using sane and I made a > working setup with a custom kernel. Nice! Can you give some more information about the setup? That would certainly be interesting to read for others. I guess you used sane-backends from pkgsrc? Any other configurations required? Which scanner model? I have an old USB scanner somewhere. Maybe I can try to set it up on a sandpoint-NAS myself, so we can see if it is a general problem. > My problem is, that the scanned images on my workstation are in a very > poor quality... Not only if I use my workstation over a network > connection... > The images I scanned with scanimage on the QNAP device are bad, too... I didn't know what a scanner-server is, but I found out that "saned" can be used to set up such a service. Ok, so the scanner is already providing a poor quality scan, when connected to the QNAP, and "saned" is irrelevant. Can you define "poor"? Is it a lower dpi resolution than expected? Or is the scan wrong (corrupted or swapped pixels, wrong colors)? > The scanner works perfectly if I use it directly attached on my > workstation. What kind of system is that? Also running NetBSD? Using the same SANE configuration? Unfortunately I cannot help you with SANE at all, as I never managed to install a NetBSD scanner myself. ;) But it would be very strange when the same scanner delivers different quality with the same NetBSD and SANE version on different systems. The USB device driver source is machine-independant, and the QNAP has a standard NEC D720101 USB chip (OHCI). My first guess would be different configurations, or a problem with big-endian in SANE (provided your workstation is little-endian). > Do I have to use different settings in my kernel? > > Here are my settings I added to the GENERIC kernel: > > #USB Generic Driver > ugen* at uhub? port ? > > #scanner > #uscanner* at uhub? port ? > usscanner* at uhub? port ? > > Any ideas? Does the scanner really talk SCSI-over-USB? Just use the same configuration as on your workstation. Regards, -- Frank Wille