Re: O2: XFree86 or X.org?
Michael Lorenz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sgimips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Jul 30, 2008, at 14:30, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote: > On Jul 30, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Michael Lorenz wrote: >> >> I don't think anyone has ever tested this on an R10k O2 though, >> there might things that bite you in the rear end. > > Well, it seems to work so far. I have only tested twm and ion. Great. Good :) Please torture it and report problems. > I can't switch back to wscons consoles though. Yeah, I never enabled that. Shouldn't be a problem on the O2 though. Maybe I should just build a dedicated, monolithic Xserver for the O2, that way we could get around the hacked libxaa.so. I had to disable a few GC ops, like PolyArc, which we can't easily do in hardware but which need special handling on the O2's tiled framebuffer. I should probably write a wrapper which breaks them down into pieces that can work on a single tile. Looks like when I'm done the crime driver won't use XAA at all. have fun Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBSJEQJspnzkX8Yg2nAQI0eQf9H8EHD7wa5KH8dXn9XQPepJWPHuiirV4B OCIxF7oY8/J3bQ3I0E+gFO7vwV71xWUPezjxcx5XonuSqMZMShIxR4m90fy51mxd 9NSYTNFBjysLBpscs6a+Y/SsmwhM1tzGqoNHWeg9TtbO9OlvphrqXYbPCiRuHEag 710InJuHrbgTI3URvbp59J5U58GXhuP934amnVNPv1TrJYo1GqqIvOsl4HNIdPa4 PbF/6QG28jpS1OONSeW5SiNEc7brVuBBfs5xRn1/z9HBeVCZhoBT95NqhNr88/Zy F6qPeTCCFZyrI5ej1PmEj2vQCJ13GwG4mIAJb89d855lD+lJmBtI8w== =NzSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----