Re: mec and resets
Michael Lorenz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sgimips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Aug 6, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > >> I can't reproduce it either, my O2 ( R5k with 1MB cache ) also built >> KDE and X over nfs without any trouble. >> >>> Is it on GENERIC32_IP3x or some customized kernel? >> >> Customized as in stripped of anything I don't need. So, basic O2 >> hardware plus ohci and ehci, compiled with -march=mips3 > > BTW, does your kernel have "options MACE_NEEDS_DELAYS"? No. > On my R5k O2, a patched kernel without the options MACE_NEEDS_DELAYS > works fine, and it's much faster than one with the option. Yeah, I meant to retire it but never got around to actually do it. I introduced it a while ago because without it mec would eventually slow down severely ( to something like 8kB/s ) - with the delays I'd get more than 1MB/s. Then you fixed the real problem ( i was merely poking around in the dark ) have fun Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBSJnJCcpnzkX8Yg2nAQIzEwf/ZxcfEDC3CTyjEmJBNHCZ1XLMbBhyJMTQ Ek5C3p3piekulOZHuacs5vDqvWoCgTkqV2FzmN9YprgEDwPrkIfC23JGqb2fU0iZ l32kHNCXECRIBp2/kUUO/V06QU8//3FdFLD7StYhamXhLGNsVHOM0rOg1RW5W1Ow e6gw+kLAICcXsqiQ4feJul0gkTFojrPuPPAhepAwpfD5FIUOshD/pgOvZCXXYjZ0 2fVNq6nQFYN1LRZbpFNqHIsg7fcYnIAscaYSYNTP4O0eWDL1KwhjF4CfFVeRffZQ FriNsrw3kC2oL7Mm1iwUJ244Zdqc+HujeXx8Gy/h4/2evQ/vZSCw6Q== =n5Sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----