Re: Issue for gcc for SuperH

Martin Husemann <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:23:36 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sh3
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:43:08AM +0000, John Klos wrote:
> Did another patch, perhaps the one disabling the optimization get 
> committed instead? Should this be committed?

Are you talking about PR target/64479 [SH] wrong optimization delayed-branch ?

That was fixed in rev 1.2 and pulled up to -7.

Martin