Re: should we add SH4 code to mmeye locore.S?
David Brownlee <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Oct 2023 18:50:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sh3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6pZDHuw==P7zWtyrvG0bT--9ZcKrYAXrb90sg=8NxY4+Dg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 08:09, Andrius V <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 5:32=E2=80=AFAM Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]= e.jp> wrote: > > > > I guess SH4 MMEYE kernels were tested only without cache enabled. > > (7750R has 8KB VIPT cache and we need to handle annoying alias issue > > especially in port specific device drivers and bus_dma(9) functions) > > > > So I'd say "leave it as is unless someone actually have test it." > > Thank you for clarification. > > > > > --- > > so it's not quite SH4 specific, but mostly used only for SH4 cache > > in primitive asm code. > > > > --- > > I guess my assumption was based that those two lines are missing in > mmeye version. > > Based on your response, I will leave the code untouched. Thank you. Would it make sense to add a comment to that effect to the code - including a specific note asking for anyone with appropriate hardware to test it? David