Re: more binary packages and emacs status
Andrew Randrianasulu <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:30:26 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+rFky7MALVapcSzzRoJiY13c+AXwOpdgY4_u21_N3reHi9QUg@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000e4f61a0648ea1e7b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D1=81=D1=80, 21 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2. 2026 =D0=B3., 21:13 Riccardo Mottola <= [email protected]>: > Hi, > > after Christmas pause... I resumed some building. > > some more useful stuff... mercurial and tcl. > xcoral editor. > > not bad. Big failures right now are emacs (but we have xemacs) > > Overall an interesting "pack" for me but I guess for other who want to > start and need the basics. > > Mouse wrote: > > How much space is needed? I've got some space I could volunteer, > > though it's behind a slow DSL link. > > right now I have 218 packages and 378MB > Cool. Do you have gcc from pkgsrc among them? I failed miserable to compile it ... (I think I tried to pull netsurf, and it tried to pull vim-shared (for xxd) and this tried to pull gcc and that failed no matter how big swap (for qemu) I tried. > Right now I am attempting ImageMagick! > And later I will try a BASIC interpreter, might be useful > Then windowmaker. > > > > Has anyone attempted compiling (hateful) rust on a low-end machine? on > SPARC? I remember that even on my Intel i3 Core laptop with 3 or 4GB it > was unbearable and took more than a day... > --000000000000e4f61a0648ea1e7b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_contai= ner"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">=D1=81=D1=80, 21 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0= =B2. 2026 =D0=B3., 21:13 Riccardo Mottola <<a href=3D"mailto:riccardo.mo= [email protected]">[email protected]</a>>:<br></div><blockquote c= lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;= padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br> <br> after Christmas pause... I resumed some building.<br> <br> some more useful stuff... mercurial and tcl.<br> xcoral editor.<br> <br> not=C2=A0 bad. Big failures right now are emacs (but we have xemacs)<br> <br> Overall an interesting "pack" for me but I guess for other who wa= nt to <br> start and need the basics.<br> <br> Mouse wrote:<br> > How much space is needed?=C2=A0 I've got some space I could volunt= eer,<br> > though it's behind a slow DSL link.<br> <br> right now I have 218 packages and 378MB<br></blockquote></div></div><div di= r=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Cool. Do you have gcc from pkgsrc am= ong them? I failed miserable to compile it ... (I think I tried to pull net= surf, and it tried to pull vim-shared (for xxd) and this tried to pull gcc = and that failed no matter how big swap (for qemu) I tried.</div><div dir=3D= "auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><div class= =3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st= yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> Right now I am attempting ImageMagick!<br> And later I will try a BASIC interpreter, might be useful<br> Then windowmaker.<br> <br> <br> <br> Has anyone attempted compiling (hateful) rust on a low-end machine? on <br> SPARC? I remember that even on my Intel i3 Core laptop with 3 or 4GB it <br= > was unbearable and took more than a day...<br> </blockquote></div></div></div> --000000000000e4f61a0648ea1e7b--