Re: NetBSD/sparc64 and GbE performance

[email protected] (John Nemeth)
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sep 27, 12:11pm, Matthias Scheler wrote:
} On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 08:45:34AM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
} > } what performance do people get with GbE cards in NetBSD/sparc64 systems?
} > } I get about 200Mb/s with the wm(4) card in my ULTRA60. If I remember
} > } correctly Solaris 10 achieved twice the throughput with a cas(4) card.
} > } But I seriously doubt that the cas(4) hardware is faster or even as
} > } fast as a wm(4) card.
} > 
} >      Why?  Have you ever read the specs of cas(4)?
} 
} No, but I used machines with those cards in the past and I remember
} various problems.
} 
} > It's a rather impressive chip.
} 
} Is it?
} 
} Cassini:
} http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ULkpSVPTL.jpg
} 
} Intel PRO 1000 MT:
} http://www.buyserverparts.com/item_images/thumb/pro-1000.jpg

     Look at those pictures a bit closer.  The Cassini is a 64-bit card
and the Intel is only a 32-bit card.

} I'm sorry but not impressed by the bulk of that thing. And it doesn't
} even support things like IP header checksum offload.

     I don't have the specsheet in front of me, but considering the
advanced capabilities of that card, I would bet that it does support IP
header checksum offload.  That's trivial compared to most of its
capabilities.  Don't use the simplistic NetBSD driver (derived from
OpenBSD) to judge it.

}-- End of excerpt from Matthias Scheler
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.