Re: Using %stick where available
Michael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Erik Fair wrote: > What's the observed performance? I'm in the process of setting up a > Sun Fire v240 and unlike the uniprocessor ultrasparcs that I have, > it's a *terrible* timekeeper. This might be just the thing the > doctor ordered ... Good question, I didn't do any measurements other than 'looks ok to me'. I think there's a bug in the code that's supposed to synchronize the CPUs' time bases - that could cause crap you'd call 'terrible timekeeping', like the clock appearing to jump back and forth semi- randomly ( whenever you hop to a different CPU ) Keeping them in sync should be much easier with the time base running at only 12MHz though. have fun Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEVAwUBUJnJgspnzkX8Yg2nAQIvLgf/ZOWgM5gDLG6lWS5rzUAjAkj65QCBzoVE d3CyWZtynDTQc2+2trxBSRHfuk1ZrXmPd5urC1+otFK/XPf6LuCyNsjVGcOKOpiv nuwy5q1zYyfd/G86gU/4tn3kHYeAb2oEjzoe7y9qMzP5MHS43zkWCjD0TOmvF43L hjD6wvGy/V1BsXv/dWluSIwLDWA51T+hEJ0rQh7Gn7sqAWBuGxa1s9l+eb9jwF4G MMs6M5j2aIgBQGLuPn9iAPxV0O+nH5njnld3qSGzW7v/S2QK0AqBMN5xAq/acd4n irPenTPT3SYQuJTvzBTnIZbPJDXhVUDTjG4PryMYDkG3ze+pv7jS6A== =zwsi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----