Re: V240 Status?

On Jan 21, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmm, I don't get very far on a U2:
> 
> # fssconfig -c -x -v fss0 /mnt /mnt/snap0
> trap type 0x60: cpu 1, pc=10f08f0 npc=10f08f4 pstate=0xffffffffff82000e<AM,PRIV,IE>
> kernel trap 60: +interrupt vector
> Stopped in pid 0.16 (system) at netbsd:kpreempt_disable+0x10:   ld              [
> %g2 + 0x14c], %l0
> db{1}> bt        
> mutex_exit(59508000, 0, 0, 0, 1009fd8, badcafe) at netbsd:mutex_exit+0x15c
> sched_curcpu_runnable_p(12b0ea0, 0, 10cdc78, 0, 0, 1) at netbsd:sched_curcpu_run
> nable_p+0x4                                                                    
> idle_loop(12c18f0, 12c1870, 12c18b0, 12b55c8, 12c18c0, 12c18d0) at netbsd:idle_l
> oop+0x1f0                                                                      


So its not V240 specific.  As high priority calls are rare (only subr_pcu.c,
and NPF through subr_pserialize.c used it so far) it is quite possible they
were never tested.

--
J. Hannken-Illjes - [email protected] - TU Braunschweig (Germany)