Re: V240 Status?

>>> Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote

> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:21:44PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > So its not V240 specific.  As high priority calls are rare (only subr_pcu.c,
> > and NPF through subr_pserialize.c used it so far) it is quite possible they
> > were never tested.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I tested back then, but I am not 100% sure right now.
> I'll have a look.

I think sparc64_ipi_ccall in mp_subr.S is suspicious.

If it is called directly from interrupt_vector in locore.s, it
requires something like TRAP_SETUP() or INTR_SETUP() to prepare
stack and others.

-- Takeshi Nakayama