Re: PCU panic on V240

Martin Husemann <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:57:17 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:24:12AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> That almost makes sense since SOFTINT_SERIAL can preempt 
> SOFTINT_CLOCK/SOFTINT_NET but servicing softints shouldn't 
> increase interrupt depth.

Is cpu_intr_p() documented anywhere?
I don't think we distinguish soft and hard ints for ci_idepths.

Martin

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.