Re: Strange deadlock
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BERTRAND Joël a écrit : > Michael a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:30:47 +0200 >> BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Some weeks ago, I have indicated here I have a stability issue >>> with my >>> Blade2000 running NetBSD : >>> >>> trap type 0x68: cpu 1, pc=410657c0 npc=410657ac >>> pstate=0xffffffff99820092<,PEF,IE> >>> Skipping crash dump on recursive panic >>> panic: +fast data access MMU miss >>> cpu1: Begin traceback... >>> cpu1: End traceback... >>> cpu0: shutting down >>> cpu1: rebooting >>> >>> That was with 6.99.40 kernel. I have changed a faulty memory module, >>> rebuilt all packages I use from sources (perl, gtk and all dependencies) >>> and rebuilt a new kernel : >>> >>> NetBSD legendre.systella.fr 6.99.47 NetBSD 6.99.47 (CUSTOM) #1: Sun Jul >>> 20 15:21:37 CEST 2014 >>> [email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/CUSTOM >>> sparc64 >>> >>> CUSTOM stands for GENERIC.MP with some minor modifications : >>> >>> sd0 at scsibus4 target 0 lun 0 >>> sd1 at scsibus4 target 1 lun 0 >>> cd0 at scsibus0 target 6 lun 0 >>> ... >>> # Wedge support >>> options DKWEDGE_AUTODISCOVER >>> options DKWEDGE_METHOD_GPT >>> >>> With 6.99.40 kernel, this workstation was stable enough to build >>> packages from sources (load average : 6). With 6.99.47, it has hanged >>> just after a few hours. >>> >>> At 12:48 (CEST), this workstation has crashed under heavy I/O (gcc48 >>> compilation). Something very similar to a deadlock and I have rebooted >>> it with power button. Console didn't respond, network subsystem didn't >>> answer to ping... There was no information on console or serial line. No >>> panic and no dump file. >>> >>> I don't think if it is sparc specific, I don't have any other >>> information. Has anyone ever seen the same problem? >> >> I've seen my sb2500 spontaneously reboot under heavy load with .47, >> it's been rock stable with .44 ( and many, many older revisions ) > > In my case, it's not a reboot, only a complete deadlock and I > haven't found any sparc64 specific modification between .40 that panics > and reboots and .47 that locks... > > Regards, > > JKB I think I have found why my blade2000 was not stable. One of CPU was dying. With a new one, system is seems to be stable with a load average greater than 6 during several days (kernel 6.99.49). I only have to buy new CPU's :-( Regards, JKB