Re: sparc64 vs. gcc 4.8

Michael <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64
Message-ID <20141006202607.5b37f25e@glenlivet>
Hello,

some more data points:
on the sb2500, recent kernels built with gcc 4.8 will either
spontaneously reboot or deadlock, sometimes after hours under full
load, sometimes earlier. Those built with gcc 4.5 will deadlock - I
haven't seen any of those spontaneously reboot yet. Since the
spontaneous reboots happen on the U60 as well with gcc 4.8 it has to be
something else than the schizo-related spontaneous reboots we've seen
earlier on US-IIIi hardware. Also, no deadlocks on the U60.
Now to the funny part. The last stable sb2500 kernel I have found here
is a 6.99.44 from mid-June. Since there was a bunch of commits in
arch/sparc64 starting at that time I downgraded arch/sparc64 to June
1st, built a kernel and ... got a deadlock. So I suspected local
changes, checked out a clean source tree, built a kernel, got a
deadlock. Then I downgraded the whole clean source thee to July 1st and
that one is still going, almost finished a build.sh -j4 distribution
with no sign of trouble.
Looks like whatever commit triggered the deadlocks is not in
arch/sparc64. Either way it seems to be a separate issue from the
spontaneous reboots.

have fun
Michael
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.