Re: Someone using COMPAT_SVR4(_32) ?

Maxime,

> If someone is interested in keeping these features, he or she has to show
> up within a month starting from now (date of the proposal). The minimum
> requirement that such a maintainer would have to reach is demonstrating,
> via patches or commits, that work is being done on improving the security of
> the features - fixing basic bugs, via audit for example - as well as their
> reliability - being able to show the functioning of an SVR4 binary being
> increased as a result of this work.
> If no maintainer is forthcoming after a month, or the maintenance threshold
> is not met within a month, the code may be removed. It is to be noted that
> the code will still be in the source code repository, should people wish to
> re-instate it in the future. If that should happen, the reasons for removing
> the code in the first place will have been addressed.

Thanks for the head's up. I am looking into it and will hopefully come up with
a patch to address this; but my time is very limited, and I would respectfully
like to ask you to extend this deadline.


Jerome