Re: NetBSD installation woes on Sun Blade 100

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 1:32 PM Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:24:50PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > This is the top-20 of stack size offenders in sparc64/GENERIC on netbsd-9:
> >
> > Frame/b       Function
> > 4096  pci_conf_print at pci_subr.c:4813
> > 3536  SHA3_Selftest at sha3.c:430
> > 3408  genfb_calc_hsize at genfb.c:630
> > 2464  procfs_domounts at procfs_linux.c:600
> > 2272  gem_pci_attach at if_gem_pci.c:147
> > 2256  twoway_memmem at memmem.c:84
> > 2240  compat_60_ptmget_ioctl at tty_60.c:70
> > 2048  db_stack_trace_print at db_trace.c:77
> > 1696  wdcprobe_with_reset at wdc.c:487
> > 1424  nfsrv_rename at nfs_serv.c:1902
> > 1392  OF_mapintr at ofw_machdep.c:728
>
> ... and latest pullups removed two of those:
>
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
>  Frame/b        Function
> -4096   pci_conf_print at pci_subr.c:4813
>  3536   SHA3_Selftest at sha3.c:430
> -3408   genfb_calc_hsize at genfb.c:630
>  2464   procfs_domounts at procfs_linux.c:600
>  2272   gem_pci_attach at if_gem_pci.c:147
>  2256   twoway_memmem at memmem.c:84
>
>
> So it would be interesting to know if a regular 9.0_STABLE now works on
> your machine (the latest one  currently available does not have the
> fixes yet, you need the next one later today or tomorrow).
>
> Or you could try booting this kernel:
>
>         https://www.NetBSD.org/~martin/netbsd-9_sparc64.gz
>
> Martin

Sorry, haven't had the time to test this all.

But i can report that i was able to run the recent daily kernel
20200829 without SSIZE modification.

Regards,
Connor