Re: Sun Netra T1 amd "memory pickyness"
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:42:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, An update. the 4x512 "mixed module" setup was not a success: it did boot but after a couple of hours of stress (compile & git are my favourites) it did hang up. I removed the one module - the second Kinston Infineon - and then it did run fine for a day compiling and working (same software, for testing) even with less RAM. Julian Coleman wrote: > You didn't mention the part numbers for the RAM that you bought, but it > might be that the machine is picky about timing (guessing here). From a > quick look, I see a picture of the 370-4281 (T1 200 RAM) with Infineon > part number "HYS72V64300GR-7.5-0" [1] and also a picture of the same part > number for Compaq/HP 177628-001 [2]. Maybe you could try that specific > Compaq part number or some other with the exact chip? part number of the sticks or of the chips? They are not original SUN parts, but what I found. should be - per Sun datasheet - standard JEDEC Buffered ECC SDRAM. Mixed with bad lucks of a probable bad module, I would say the Kingston Infineonn 7.5 is not a nice player. It has chips HYB39S256400DT-7.5 I would suppose that the 7.5 would go fine with the Samsung TC75/UC75, Instead apparently the Infineon 7 works better together. Or perhaps the buffers? didn't check those. Perhaps it makes to buy another DIMM off eBay and see if I have good luck. I would say the board is still sound and it is a DIMM issue. Perhaps I can read the chips in the picture and stay away from Infineon 7.5 :) Either faster infineon or Samsung. Or would trying PC166 RAM make sense? should be retro-compatible. Did you also experience such issues with this or similar machines? I did check in the manual and all banks are independent, so no DIMM pairing. Riccardo