Re: spdmem matching (Was: envstat drivers on SUN Ultra-45?)
Julian Coleman <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:02:40 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aY91UBvSqBo8DzlO@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> |
Hi, > > I think I added it because my Tadpole Viper has it as the only entry in > > 'compatible', and IIRC the name matching didn't find it for some > > reason. It's been years ago though, memory is fuzzy :/ > > Since it's causing confusion I have no objection to removing it. > > I wonder if we could remove it from spdmem_i2c and instead add a patch > for the Viper Having experimented with patching OFW on the U45, I don't think that we should change the existing spdmem_i2c match. I'm not sure exactly what this chip is on the U45, but I think that patching there to get a better match makes more sense. Regards, Julian --