Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man8/man8.sparc64
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:28:01 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 18:42:05 +0200, Julian Coleman wrote: > Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 18:42:05 +0200 > From: Julian Coleman <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man8/man8.sparc64 > Newsgroups: gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 > To: [email protected] > > Hi, > > > > sparc64 boot(8): brush up > > > > This manpage has the following passage that I fail to parse: > > > > The secondary boot loader, *ofwboot*, takes *boot* virtually the > > same commands as Open Firmware. > > > > Can someone, please, fix or reword this? > > I think that it's trying to say that we can use the same device names in > both OFW and boot. How about: > > The secondary boot loader, *ofwboot*, understands the same device names > and aliases as Open Firmware. > > I must admit that I haven't tested that this is (always) the case. I > wonder if that's why the "virtually" is there, even though it's not > very helpful. Ah, I didn't realize it was from your latest change: @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ The secondary boot loader, .Nm ofwboot , takes .Nm -commands virtually the same as Open Firmware. +virtually the same commands as Open Firmware. where the second .Nm is "boot", so it was: The secondary boot loader, *ofwboot*, takes *boot* commands virtually the same as Open Firmware. which makes sense. Ok if I revert that hunk? -uwe