Re: sun3 port different then many others
"Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Does this mean that the sun2 port is more up to date ? (it seems to have that structure rather than the one the sun3 port has) Also, of interest I see it builds with -msoft_float ... shouldn't it have -m68881 ? What would be involved in bringing the sun3 port up to speed with the way the rest of the ports work ? (I'm guessin it would be a quite a bit of work) Is there any docs on the old structure vs the new structure ? -- Curt >Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:08:03 -0700 (PDT) >From: Jeremy Cooper <[email protected]> >X-X-Sender: <[email protected]> >To: "Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <[email protected]> >cc: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > >On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote: > >> In particular, I'm stuck on: >> >> 1. No bus_space_tag_t type >> 2. No bus_space_mmap function >> 3. No bus_addr_t >> 4. No BUS_SPACE_MAP_LINEAR define >> > >Curt, I'm sorry you're having so many problems. They all stem from one >cause: the sun3 port is a bit out of date. People haven't worked on it >for a while, meanwhile, the rest of NetBSD has marched forward. > >The problem you mention above is due to the fact that the "bus DMA" >framework to which these functions belong was never incorporated into the >sun3 port. No one has attempted to port a driver to the sun3 for a good >while now; hence, your initiative is stirring up long settled dust and >revealing the oversight. >