Re: sun3 port different then many others

"Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Does this mean that the sun2 port is more up to date ?  (it seems to
have that structure rather than the one the sun3 port has)

Also, of interest I see it builds with -msoft_float ... shouldn't it
have -m68881 ?

What would be involved in bringing the sun3 port up to speed with the
way the rest of the ports work ?  (I'm guessin it would be a quite a bit
of work)  Is there any docs on the old structure vs the new structure ?


-- Curt

>Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Jeremy Cooper <[email protected]>
>X-X-Sender: <[email protected]>
>To: "Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <[email protected]>
>cc: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
>
>On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
>
>> In particular, I'm stuck on:
>>
>> 1. No bus_space_tag_t type
>> 2. No bus_space_mmap function
>> 3. No bus_addr_t
>> 4. No BUS_SPACE_MAP_LINEAR define
>>
>
>Curt, I'm sorry you're having so many problems.  They all stem from one
>cause: the sun3 port is a bit out of date.  People haven't worked on it
>for a while, meanwhile, the rest of NetBSD has marched forward.
>
>The problem you mention above is due to the fact that the "bus DMA"
>framework to which these functions belong was never incorporated into the
>sun3 port.  No one has attempted to port a driver to the sun3 for a good
>while now; hence, your initiative is stirring up long settled dust and
>revealing the oversight.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.