RE: Port to Sun 386i
"Zach Lowry" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 My cable is indeed a bit flaky. Is there a good way on these machines to disable the keyboard completely so it'll pass the self-tests, and I can use Serial Console only? Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network Administration Registered Linux User #264589 14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Curtis H. Wilbar > Jr. > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i > > > > Nice grab on the docs.... I had a complete doc set (including all > the man pages, document rack, etc). However, that was when I > worked at Sun, and despite the fact that I saved it from the trash, > I didn't get it out of there before I left.... and my manager would > not let me take it because I admitted it was Sun property..... I'm > sure it went into the recycle bin less than a week after I left > :-(. > > I have a -150 and two -250 386i systems. I also have a 486i > system. > > Time permitting, I can test things out ... well... if I can find > my 386i keyboard/mouse/monitor cable setup.... I think I only have > one... possibly two... for 4 systems :-(. > > -- Curt > > >Delivered-To: [email protected] > >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=8.0 > >From: "Zach Lowry" <[email protected]> > >To: "David Brownlee" <[email protected]> > >Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i > >Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:38:54 -0500 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 > >Importance: Normal > > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >I got my 386i today. It's a -250 model, complete with Hi-res Color > >FB and a single memory board, whichever one the -250 came with. I > >also got a reportedly somewhat flaky video/keyboard cable and a > >20" Color Sun Monitor. > > > >The real prize, however, is in the documentation. > > > >Sun386i man Pages Supplement (December 1988) > >Sun386i Owner's Notes > >Sun386i Administrator's and Developer's Notes > >Field Service Notes > >Sun386i Owver's Bulletin SunOS release 4.0.1 > >Installing Sun386i SunOS 4.0.1 > >Sun386i Configuration Guide (February 1989) > >Replacement Pages for the Sun386i Developer's Guide > >Sun386i Developer's Guide (May 1988) > >Sun386i SNAP Administration > >Sun386i Advanced Administration (June 1988) > >Sun386i Advanced Administration (February 1989) > >Sun386i Administration Cookbook > > > >Will be reading and having fun with this guy, and hopefully > >someone else out there can test on a -150. > > > >Thanks! > > > >Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net > >Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network > >Administration > > > >Registered Linux User #264589 > >14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of David > >> Brownlee Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:18 PM > >> To: Zach Lowry > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected] Subject: Re: Port to Sun 386i > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Zach Lowry wrote: > >> > >> > I am soon to recieve a Sun 386i, which I notice has not been > >> > ported to yet. Since for the past little bit I've been > >> > acquainting myself with my Sun 3/60 and 3/80s, I feel > >> > comfortable saying that I intend to port NetBSD to this unique > >> > machine. > >> > > >> Excellent news - do you know if its a 150 or 250 (the 250 had > >> had max 16M rather than 8M and had IIRC an extra cache) > >> > >> > I'm looking for advice, however, since I've bever done this > >> > sort of thing before. Would it be best to start with the i386 > >> > port, remove all devices except those explicitly available in > >> > the 386i and then merge drivers for Framebuffers and the like > >> > from the sun3 port? From what I understand, the normal color > >> > and B&W framebuffers on the 386i correspond to the cg3 and > >> > bw2, but additionally there exists a cg5 card and a VGA card > >> > for DOS emulation under SunOS. > >> > >> That would make sense - probably start with either using > >> the PROM console or serial console to minimise the amount > >> of driver writing to getting something booting. > >> > >> > I'm also aware that there existed memory add-ons in the form > >> > of ISA cards, could anyone clarify on these boards, and would > >> > it be possible to support them? > >> > >> I don't remember any ISA memory boards, but it _should_ be > >> possible to support standard ISA boards, possible DMA > >> considerations notwithstanding :) > >> > >> > >> -- > >> David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype > >> required -- > >> > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: PGP 7.0.4 > > > >iQA/AwUBPvfGVYHWQmQc5olOEQLIigCeJMn5oVfR+3N5n4M8Mv97obFL8jMAnAm/ > >F/fVctcfPUHHHHjMa9Bo6WiB > >=1xDl > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPviSbIHWQmQc5olOEQI8JwCfUQ+7vtTFg2Bp5yyiNjhNbtRllIYAoOC8 5qcd+AqMdraJ+xBIDIcSJSh2 =QdUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----