RE: Port to Sun 386i

"Zach Lowry" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

My cable is indeed a bit flaky. Is there a good way on these machines
to disable the keyboard completely so it'll pass the self-tests, and
I can use Serial Console only?

Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net
Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network Administration

Registered Linux User #264589
14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Curtis H. Wilbar
> Jr.
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i
> 
> 
> 
> Nice grab on the docs.... I had a complete doc set (including all
> the man pages, document rack, etc).  However, that was when I
> worked at Sun, and despite the fact that I saved it from the trash,
> I didn't get it out of there before I left.... and my manager would
> not let me take it because I admitted it was Sun property.....  I'm
> sure it went into the recycle bin less than a week after I left
> :-(.
> 
> I have a -150 and two -250 386i systems.  I also have a 486i
> system.  
> 
> Time permitting, I can test things out ...  well... if I can find
> my 386i keyboard/mouse/monitor cable setup....  I think I only have
> one... possibly two... for 4 systems :-(.
> 
> -- Curt
> 
> >Delivered-To: [email protected]
> >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=8.0
> >From: "Zach Lowry" <[email protected]>
> >To: "David Brownlee" <[email protected]>
> >Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, 
> <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i
> >Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:38:54 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> >Importance: Normal
> >
> > 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >I got my 386i today. It's a -250 model, complete with Hi-res Color
> >FB and a single memory board, whichever one the -250 came with. I
> >also got a reportedly somewhat flaky video/keyboard cable and a
> >20" Color Sun Monitor. 
> >
> >The real prize, however, is in the documentation. 
> >
> >Sun386i man Pages Supplement (December 1988)
> >Sun386i Owner's Notes
> >Sun386i Administrator's and Developer's Notes
> >Field Service Notes
> >Sun386i Owver's Bulletin SunOS release 4.0.1
> >Installing Sun386i SunOS 4.0.1
> >Sun386i Configuration Guide (February 1989)
> >Replacement Pages for the Sun386i Developer's Guide
> >Sun386i Developer's Guide (May 1988)
> >Sun386i SNAP Administration
> >Sun386i Advanced Administration (June 1988)
> >Sun386i Advanced Administration (February 1989)
> >Sun386i Administration Cookbook
> >
> >Will be reading and having fun with this guy, and hopefully
> >someone else out there can test on a -150. 
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net
> >Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network
> >Administration  
> >
> >Registered Linux User #264589
> >14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of David
> >> Brownlee Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:18 PM
> >> To: Zach Lowry
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> [email protected] Subject: Re: Port to Sun 386i
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Zach Lowry wrote:
> >> 
> >> > I am soon to recieve a Sun 386i, which I notice has not been
> >> > ported to yet. Since for the past little bit I've been
> >> > acquainting myself with my Sun 3/60 and 3/80s, I feel
> >> > comfortable saying that I intend to port NetBSD to this unique
> >> > machine. 
> >> >
> >> 	Excellent news - do you know if its a 150 or 250 (the 250 had
> >> 	had max 16M rather than 8M and had IIRC an extra cache)
> >> 
> >> > I'm looking for advice, however, since I've bever done this
> >> > sort of thing before. Would it be best to start with the i386
> >> > port, remove all devices except those explicitly available in
> >> > the 386i and then merge drivers for Framebuffers and the like
> >> > from the sun3 port? From what I understand, the normal color
> >> > and B&W framebuffers on the 386i correspond to the cg3 and
> >> > bw2, but additionally there exists a cg5 card and a VGA card
> >> > for DOS emulation under SunOS.
> >> 
> >> 	That would make sense - probably start with either using
> >> 	the PROM console or serial console to minimise the amount
> >> 	of driver writing to getting something booting.
> >> 
> >> > I'm also aware that there existed memory add-ons in the form
> >> > of ISA cards, could anyone clarify on these boards, and would
> >> > it be possible to support them?
> >> 
> >> 	I don't remember any ISA memory boards, but it _should_ be
> >> 	possible to support standard ISA boards, possible DMA
> >> 	considerations notwithstanding :)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> 		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype 
> >> required --
> >> 
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: PGP 7.0.4
> >
> >iQA/AwUBPvfGVYHWQmQc5olOEQLIigCeJMn5oVfR+3N5n4M8Mv97obFL8jMAnAm/
> >F/fVctcfPUHHHHjMa9Bo6WiB
> >=1xDl
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPviSbIHWQmQc5olOEQI8JwCfUQ+7vtTFg2Bp5yyiNjhNbtRllIYAoOC8
5qcd+AqMdraJ+xBIDIcSJSh2
=QdUp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.