P4 on sun3/sun3x (Re: NetBSD/sun3 10.0_RC2 problems on sun 3/60)
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:47:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sun3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADuzgbqqOjpwEWnb3CauBtLgxNzROpDN2uJ=jXh9cVGG7WLY0A@mail.gmail.com> |
Le lun. 15 janv. 2024 =C3=A0 01:00, foo bar <[email protected]> a =C3=A9cr= it : > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 3:35=E2=80=AFAM Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected].= ne.jp> wrote: > > Oh, actually 501-1248 works on 3/80? (Mine has 501-1443) > > "THE SUN HARDWARE REFERENCE" part 1 says P4 on 3/80 is not same > > as P4 on 3/60, but maybe it's about physical shape.. > > https://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-sun3/2023/05/07/msg000199.html > I think that's talking about the physical shape of the cards. As far > as I can tell the 3/80 is the only machine with a P4 slot that does > not have holes for BNC connectors so the cards won't physically fit in > the machine. I had to take the motherboard out, remove the back plate, > and put the motherboard in a sparcstation clone case to use this > cgfour. Well, thank you, that seems to confirm that the P4 is logically/electricall= y the same across sun and sun3x, or at least they are 'backward compatible' (they could have added /STERM on an otherwise not conflicting pin to open the option of synchronous cycle to the P4 device, though by that time SPARC was the future and sun3/sun3x were not likely to be updated). The partial pinout that was shared with me on this list strongly suggested so, and my own continuity checking confirmed a few more signals. Has a 3/60 framebuffer works in a 3/80, that means at least all the signals for asynchronous cycle (of the '020/'030) are in the same spot, and so do most/all of the power signals, and no conflicts. Unfortunately my 3/80 motherboard blew a cap when I tried to power it up with my homemade ATX adapter (https://github.com/rdolbeau/SS1_ATX). The pinouts of the adapter seem OK to me and I haven't figured out why, I presume the cap died of old age... Anyway the mobo didn't give any sign of life.on the serai port when i tried again, so for now my idea of a P4FPGA to follow up on the SBusFPGA is stalled. Cordially, --=20 Romain Dolbeau