Re: NetBSD/vax vm for github testing

Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.vax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2025-01-06 19:29:32 +0000, John Klos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > However it takes 24 minutes even to build ancient small emacs-18.59.
> > simh emulating microvax3900 on my i5-4570 NetBSD/amd64 took ~70 hours
> > to build perl 5.38.2 (from pkgsrc-2023Q4) so it won't finish in
> > 6 hour github CI limit.
> 
> I suppose because additional cores can't be thrown at simh, this
> is a difficult limit.
> 
> What do others do when something comes close to that limit? Do
> they just add cores and increase -j?

Just wait for it. I personally prefer to not do parallel builds as I
quite often compare build logs. That just won't fly...

  I haven't tried that, but maybe it would be worth to give it a shot:
Can we use the Tools cross-gcc as a backend to distcc on a fast amd64
host and use that either on a VAX to compile stuff, or even for
cross-building pkgsrc packages on an amd64 host? I've never been in
that route and don't know anything about whether that's already
working / supported.

MfG, JBG

--
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQQlDTvPcScNjKREqWEdvV51g5nhuwUCZ3xDyAAKCRAdvV51g5nh
u8CxAJ9bhVisLVUVzqJBJaIZ76i+51dtgACeN1EkJx3llScl9/eFMaOI2820C54=
=A7bv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.