Re: PSA: Clock drift and pkgin

"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.vax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

> >  It's the normal procedure when `ntpd' cannot cope with the drift and the 
> > sync drops.  It then adjusts system tick duration and tries to resync from 
> > scratch.  Reachability will cycle through 1, 3, 7, 17, 37, 77, 177, to 377 
> > octal then.  This also means `ntpd' was still in sync two days ago, though 
> > my samples didn't actually catch it (at 1024 poll rate I'd have to wait 
> > long).
> 
> The "377" is an octal representation of a (shifted) bitlist showing
> the most recent 8 time requests for that peer. As you wrote, you
> synced (ntpdate?) that box about a week ago, so I would have expected
> (as the two oldest `peers` stats are waaay after that) that it, since
> then, always reached its peers. But the non-377 values tell that ntpd
> thinks it didn't reach that peer at those times.

 No, when `ntpd' resyncs it restarts from 0, dropping the earlier status.

> >  Well, 1024 is already the maximum AFAIK.
> 
> Eh, that was expressed misleadingly :(  I ment: It recognized trouble
> keeping time, why didn't it increase poll rate (ie. _reducing_ the
> poll _interval_ from its maximum of 1024 seconds)?

 I don't know.  I think it shouldn't have gone beyond 64 in the first 
place in these circumstances.

  Maciej
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.