Re: xvfb not built on vax and x68k?

David Brownlee wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> 
>> On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Brad Parker wrote:
>>> David Brownlee wrote:
>>>>     any
>>>>     objections to making those two ports consistent with all
>>>>     the others so all NetBSD ports build the Xvfb virtual
>>>>     framebuffer X server?
>>>
>>> If it balloons out the build times I'd prefer not, at least on the
>>> vax port.  None of the vaxen I use have frame buffers.
>>
>> Well, I think the point of xvfb is that it doesn't require or use a
>> framebuffer in the machine.
> 
>     Yup, exactly. The relative additional time for a build with
>     and without xvb is going to be marginal - if you want to
>     save build time you should skip building X11 altogether,
>     or crossbuild from a faster box. Given that x68k is going
>     to have xvfb added that would leave vax as the odd port
>     out.

You are aware that "marginal" might very well mean days here?

	Johnny

-- 
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                   ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: [email protected]             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol