Re: xvfb not built on vax and x68k?
Patrick Finnegan <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:12:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x68k,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.x11,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.vax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Brad Parker wrote: > David Brownlee wrote: > > any > > objections to making those two ports consistent with all > > the others so all NetBSD ports build the Xvfb virtual > > framebuffer X server? > > If it balloons out the build times I'd prefer not, at least on the > vax port. None of the vaxen I use have frame buffers. Well, I think the point of xvfb is that it doesn't require or use a framebuffer in the machine. Pat -- Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/ The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org