Re: xvfb not built on vax and x68k?

Patrick Finnegan <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:12:12 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x68k,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.x11,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.vax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Brad Parker wrote:
> David Brownlee wrote:
> > 	any
> > 	objections to making those two ports consistent with all
> > 	the others so all NetBSD ports build the Xvfb virtual
> > 	framebuffer X server?
>
> If it balloons out the build times I'd prefer not, at least on the
> vax port.  None of the vaxen I use have frame buffers.

Well, I think the point of xvfb is that it doesn't require or use a 
framebuffer in the machine.

Pat
-- 
Purdue University Research Computing ---  http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge                  ---  http://computer-refuge.org