Re: split pow(4)
[email protected] (Minoura Makoto) Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:11:15 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
// Yeah, it was originally written by me more than 15 years // ago (my first kernel code! wow!). thanks for improving it. Perhaps, pow(4) is not a pseudo device. If we ignore backward compatibility some part of pow(4) job should pushed out to the userland (via sram(4)); the remaining part could go to rtc(4), or it's child device? -- Minoura Makoto <[email protected]>