Re: stdbool.h vs SupportDefs.h

Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbeos.kernel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2005-03-17 at 16:16:28 [+0100], Jérome DUVAL wrote:
[...]
> 
> some comments :
> * I know that a stdbool.h is defined by GCC, so we could theorically remove 
> this stdbool.h
> * headers/os/drivers/device_manager.h isn't including a stdbool.h, there is 
> a warning about incompatibility with gcc definitions obviously
> 
> Thoughts ?

I believe, we won't get around having the compiler headers in our tree 
anyway, since otherwise building under Linux turns out to be really 
problematic. I'd say we add a `headers/gcc' directory with subdirectories for 
the GCC version we want to support (`2.95', `3.3', etc. -- minor versions are 
probably not necessary), and add the respective one of those directories to 
the include search paths (instead of the compiler include dir).

CU, Ingo


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.