Re: condvar

Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2005-03-17 at 22:34:03 [+0100], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > As it's already implemented, we might as well make it public for 
> > R1.
> > Anyway, I'll add the functions to the public OS.h header, and add a
> > syscall for them - we can then still decide what to do when we 
> > actually
> > do release something; until then it's private anyway :-)
> The problem doing it this way around is that you'll surely forget 
> about it 
> (you mentioned your dementia yourself ;-) and it will end up being 
> public 
> without giving it a second thought. It's definitely an API extension 
> and 
> not even one I consider likely to be used by anyone, so I don't see 
> any 
> reason to make it public before R1.

We need to go over all the ToDo items for R1 anyway, and I'll make sure 
there is one.

Bye,
   Axel.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click