Re: B_STAT_CHANGED
"Axel Dörfler" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbeos.kernel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <14077419523-BeMail@zon> |
Philippe Houdoin <[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW I noticed that R5 and our BMessage don't know when they were > > built > > or sent. In Dano/Zeta, every message contains a timestamp which I > > find > > very useful. It would be easy to add this to our KMessage, but > > there is > > probably no way to add it to BMessages without changing their > > flattened > > structure. > Usefull, indeed. Sort of de-facto "when" field... > > On Haiku, what about adding systematicly a "timestamp" field or like? > Prefixed, most probably. > > I don't have Dano nor Zeta to check, but it their BMessage class have > a > Timestamp() method, we can even bring forward compatibility here... They have HasWhen() and When() - probably to be compatible to R5 flattened messages. > Does someone have checked if that's not also stored as a field in > Dano+? I haven't checked, but I would be surprised if that's the case :-) Bye, Axel. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click