Re: RBTree implementation an d thread structure

"Salvatore Benedetto" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, I think it is not that bad if we work on two different
> schedulers for the same OS,
> as we could benchmark both and see the one that fits better, or 
> better
> yet, we could "steal" each other ideas to make the best out of it.
> Competition always brings good results.

I wouldn't mind either - having two good schedulers to choose from is 
definitely better than having no option :-)
I wouldn't mind if both would follow a different approach, though. 
Looking at FreeBSD benchmarks, the CFS performs rather poorly in 
comparison (well, not to our current one, anyway).

Bye,
   Axel.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone