Re: Real Time threads

"André Braga" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 May 2008 14:00:44 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbeos.kernel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Axel Dörfler <[email protected]> wrote:
>  The policy is very simple: is there is a real time thread ready, it is
>  served.

:D

I told him so, he didn't believe me...

Anyway, I guess there's another question that's on the back of his
head (and mine as well): do we want this behaviour to remain as is?
Are there any other plans regarding how RT threads should eventually
(R2, Rx) behave? Even though the current "naïve" approach seems quite
sound to handle soft-RT, there are many hard-RT strategies described
in the literature, and I always considered the possibility of having a
two-level scheduler, the upper level serving RT threads and the lower,
non-RT.

BTW, the cooperation/competition/exchange of ideas between Salvo and
me is going on great :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone