Re: Real Time threads

"André Braga" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, I guess there's another question that's on the back of his
> head (and mine as well): do we want this behaviour to remain as is?
> Are there any other plans regarding how RT threads should eventually
> (R2, Rx) behave? Even though the current "naïve" approach seems quite
> sound to handle soft-RT, there are many hard-RT strategies described
> in the literature, and I always considered the possibility of having 
> a
> two-level scheduler, the upper level serving RT threads and the 
> lower,
> non-RT.

I don't have any plans to add any hard-RT facilities into Haiku. If you 
want to change that, do it, but it's not my cup of tea :-)

> BTW, the cooperation/competition/exchange of ideas between Salvo and
> me is going on great :)

Nice to hear :-)

Bye,
   Axel.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Open-beos-kernel-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-beos-kernel-devel