Re: [music-dsp] VST standard (fwd)

I have written two mails to Steinberg as Xentronix, pointing
out the recreation of BeOS.

So Far no response.

Frans van Nispen.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]Namens David Shipman
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 augustus 2002 1:25
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: [openbeosmediakit] [music-dsp] VST standard (fwd)



Cross-posted due to quietness of mediakit list... 

See the message attached below, from the music-dsp mailing list.

I think it is absolutely vital for OBOS as a media platform to have 
VST3 support, 
has anyone contacted Steinberg yet=3F (note : I haven't done so myself 
because I know that individuals making (sometimes conflicting) 
suggestions can do a lot more harm than good... although I've signed up 
for the VST dev list...)

------ Forwarded message: ------
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:01:44 +0200 (MEST)
From: Bram De Jong <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [music-dsp] VST standard [was : 32 bit floats in VST mixing 
systems]
Reply-To: [email protected]


On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Russell Borogove wrote:
>
> Yeah, IMO, the VST spec is badly written on this
> point, and the VST developer/user communities should
> continue to exert "evolutionary pressure" on host
> developers to ensure that this is how things work
> going forward.
>

Steinberg is writing the specs for VST 3.0 as we speak. Anyone who has
something interesting to say about the standard should try joining the
vst plugins list RIGHT NOW!!