Re: Eek! Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #2109
"Philippe Houdoin" <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:00:59 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbeos.midi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3052462193-BeMail@hamlet> |
> Philippe, what happened? Why these changes? Argh, I'm trapped! Well, I'm in the process to move our binary resource files to human=20 readable/editable .rdef files. But... seems that I've overlooked some issues in this (very boring)=20 process.=20 > > From: Philippe Houdoin > > -resource app_signature "application/x-vnd.OpenBeOS.midi-server"; > > +resource app_signature "application/x-vnd.OBOS-midi_server"; >=20 > This one seems rather pointless, since the name is going to change=20 > anyway. I fall in the "copy/paste" mistake trap once again. The previous .rdef I used as template for the midi_server.rdef was=20 using a x-vnd.OBOS-filename convention. You know what happened next: select "filename" and type "midi_server". Blind and idiot change. > However, I'm more worried about the following: >=20 > > -resource(10, "bus_large") #'ICON' array > > -resource(11, "bus_small") #'MICN' array >=20 > Why were these removed? They are used by the midi_server to display=20 > icons > for the endpoints from /dev/midi. They are not supposed to be the=20 > icon of > the midi_server itself, which is what you changed it to, apparently! Yeah, my bad. After the tenth .rsrc -> .rdef conversion, the bored=20 factor made me did that mistake. I will fix these issues ASAP, promise. Sorry for breaking code.=20 I'll try to keep them only on my own team in the future ;-)=20 - Phil -- Fortune Cookie Says: An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it. -- James Michener, "Space"