Re: Status update
Jerome Leveque <jerl1-fBIn7JHAfCbUKx/[email protected]> Sun, 16 May 2004 14:45:32 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbeos.midi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Hi all, > Hi > Warning: this is a long email :-). In the last few days, I fixed a=20 > number of > outstanding issues with the Midi Kit, and I would like to let you know=20 > what > I did and where we stand now. > Next time make a newsletter ;) > THE SOFTSYNTH (PART 1) > > > Jerome, this is different from what you wanted to do. BSoftSynth is a > replacement for your SynthConsumer class. If you are still interested i= n > working on the softsynth, you should use BSoftSynth for that. I did not= =20 > use > your MidiFileProducer and MidiFileConsumer. Instead, I used BMidiStore = to > implement BMidiSynthFile. But it was good to have your code, because it > saved me a lot of work :-) Thanks. > As soon I will have some time I will work on it. I have write this 3 class because Midi1 are on death time and that's=20 stupid to use it for using MidiFiles or softsynth we will use it on OpenBeOS R2. For class MidiFileXxx most of my work are based from your work on=20 BMidiFile. > THE SOFTSYNTH (PART 2) > Jerome, I hope you don't mind that I am looking at an alternative for=20 > your > synth. I know that you are very busy and don't have a lot of time to=20 > work on > it. Ideally, we would like to be able to demonstrate a fully working Mi= di > Kit at WalterCon (mid June this year) and for that we need the synth. O= f > course, if yours turns out to be better, we will use that instead ;-) > I'm not thinking about that. Don't worry. But have you test it or it doesn't work at all becausse at home that work pretty good. Still a lot of unimplemented features and lot of bugs. Thanks again for the work you do Matthijs --=20 A+ Jerome