Re: Device API: Implementation

> Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
>
[...]
> > implement that functionality in the kernel=3F Since I currently 
> > don't 
> > think
> > it is, I would tend to leave it in userland, unless there are 
> > unbeatable
> > benefits.
> 
> I'd say, let us do it in the registrar now (but still have the 
> possibility of node monitoring in the kernel as well), if we will 
> ever 
> have a reason to move it into the kernel, that would be no problem, 
> anyway.

Yep.

> > > > Very nice. I'm waiting with bated breath. ;-)
> > > Don't do that too long :-))
> > > I think I will first complete the stdio almost rewrite before 
> > > following
> > > the next topic :)
> > Fair enough.
> 
> Well, I've spent too much time on that thing already :-/

:-(

CU, Ingo