Re: Facing the End ;-)

"Axel Dörfler" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbeos.storage
Message-ID <1728175688-BeMail@nichtsnutz>
"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am not so sure about that... basically, we should be able to hide 
> > the 
> > inner partitioning workings from the user. Of course, for so 
> > limited 
> > systems as the Intel partitioning scheme, it's beneficial (or even 
> > needed) for the user to specify a partition as primary or active 
> > partition, but I wouldn't enforce a graphical interaction.
> > Better have a standard structure for every partitioning module that 
> > can 
> > be used by a graphical partition add-on as well as a CLI 
> > implementation.
> Mmh, you're not really proposing to provide an API for each 
> partitioning scheme and file system, are you=3F I would consider that a 
> bit of overkill. In my opinion the GUI add-on is sufficient and 
> preferred by 99.99 % of the users. If someone doesn't like it, or has 
> plans like mass-partitioning over network, well, the sources are 
> open.

I was only aiming at one file system/partition specific structure to be 
exchanged by one API.

> BTW, for the intel partition module, I extracted the reusable code 
> into 
> separate source files (intel=5Fpartition=5Fmap.{h,cpp} for the structures 
> and intel=5Fparameters.{h,cpp} for the conversion to and from 
> parameters 
> strings), that I intend to reuse in the GUI add-on. I would see 
> nothing, that would prevent anyone from using them as well.

If I understand you correctly, that's what I had in mind.

> > Oh yeah :-))
> > If OpenBeOS turns out to be the one and only, we can move the 
> > OpenTracker repository into ours as well, and maintaining it with 
> > the 
> > rest of the system.
> I somehow doubt, that this will happen. Not that I wouldn't find that 
> desirable.

I guess this depends a bit on Zeta, since that one will be the only 
other binary compatible OS.
Given the communicative ability combined with strange open/closed 
source approaches of all those other projects, I think we are the only 
"real" alternative for most BeOS users.
Well, no one can be sure for now anyway :-)

Adios...
   Axel.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.