Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

> 
> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> [...] 
> > Mmh, that doesn't sound like something I like. If I understand you 
> > correctly, the file system needs to access other sessions than the 
> > one 
> > passed to it.
> 
> Exactly, that's what the term multi-session is about! Generally, the 
> file system uses absolute (and not session relative) block numbers 
> for 
> multi-session volumes.

That was something I had no idea about. I thought, sessions were not 
much different from partitions, only on a higher level (so that a 
session could contain several partitions).

CU, Ingo