Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> What I think this means for us is that (barring further discoveries) 
> we 
> can't completely know which volumes form a set without parsing the 
> whole filesystem to look for references to othjer sessions, and even 
> that fails in the event that all the files in the volume are updated.

That might be right, yes. Anyway, how does one differentiate between a 
session of a multi-session volume, and a single session=3F AFAIK, the 
single session uses session dependent block addressing, not global one 
like the multi-sessions.
So we at least need a reliable way to differentiate between both.

Adios...
   Axel.