Re: First C Device API Draft
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbeos.storage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote: > Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote: > > > partscan (for partition scanner, better suggestions are welcome :-) > > How about diskscan (more general, considering sessions)=3F Or > > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner (descriptive, though long)=3F > > What about just disk=5Fscanner=3F Anyway, I like diskscan and > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner both more than partscan :-) Damn, naming is always the hardest part -- coding is so much easier. ;-) If nobody minds, I will decide for one of the names before I check the stuff in (solved my ssh problem). This won't probably be before Friday night, though. If anyone feels like checking it in earlier, just go ahead. > I haven't got any time right now, but I'll try to do some useful > replies tomorrow! At least for me it's not that urgent. Tomorrow I will take a day off for a trip to the mountains and on Thursday I'll fly back to Germany, arriving at home Friday night. Tyler, if you have time and can't wait to do something ;-), I think, it wouldn't be a bad idea to write a BFS and a CD session module, so that we have at least one module of each kind for testing. In case we change the module API, they won't be too hard to adjust. CU, Ingo