Re: session module

"Axel D=F6rfler"  <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Right, that would be another good idea as long as we don't allow 
> > > our 
> > > users to resize partitions and move them around :-)
> > > (which will be perfectly true for R1)
> > Even then I see no problem, since the system would update the data.
> 
> Of course, that would only be possible when the system knows about 
> all 
> the mount points to be updated.
> If we don't have that global mount settings file, and the file system 
> can't query reparse points, only the settings of mounted volumes 
> could 
> be updated.

Mmh, I can't follow here. Since the actual partitioning is done in 
kernel, it should know, which partitions are concerned, even, if they 
aren't mounted. Or do I miss something=3F

CU, Ingo