Re: session module

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2003-02-19 at 07:10:52 [-0800], Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > I think such a cookie would be fine in the kernel, but I would
> > definitely not pass it to the userland. If only the kernel caused
> > accesses to the disk=5Fscanner modules, when updating its live list, 
> > then
> > that will work. In this case the userland would get a copy of the
> > kernel's list instead of causing module access itself.
> > 
> 
> Well, I'd say that's another good reason to move things into the 
> kernel, as it could greatly speed up CD recognition.

Yes, I'm more and more inclined to that to.

CU, Ingo