Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> [multi-volume-standard deviation woes]
> > IMO users should be punished for using Windows applications, that 
> > don't follow standards. ;-) I couldn't resist. :-P
> Fair enough. :-) Other than not wanting to alienate potential 
> converts, 
> I would tend to agree (that, and I haven't bothered to figure out how 
> to burn in BeOS yet, so I actually fall into that very category still 
> :-0).

Depending on how you do it, it's very convenient to burn CDs with BeOS 
- if only for the reason that you don't have to boot into Windows :-))
As a small teaser: I've copied my behaviour from stippi who has a "to 
burn" folder on the desktop - whenever he wants to burn something he 
creates links in that folder, and then runs a script that creates the 
image. I'll then burn that image using Marcus' great CD-Manager 
application :-)

> > What concerns me more, is the CD-absolute addressing. Our ISO9660 
> > FS
> > would need to recognize the CD as an ill-formatted one and use 
> > absolute
> > addresses in this case, while for standard conformant ones the 
> > correct
> > addressing would be used. I think, that should be feasible at 
> > least.
> Well, as best I can tell, the one I'm using currently has no problem 
> with any of the CDs I've thrown at it (though I haven't tested 
> exhaustively), and I thought we got that one for free, as it comes in 
> the R5 sample code.

Well, the one that comes with R5 just don't support multi-session disks 
at all. And I *know* from the one I've written, that it has some 
problems with some CDs - I happen to own such a thing :-)
(the AmigaOS 3.9 CD, if somebody cares :-))

Adios...
   Axel.