Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, the one that comes with R5 just don't support multi-session 
> > disks at all. And I *know* from the one I've written,
> Man, you did indeed write a multisession ISO9660 FS! I thought that 
> was 
> a joke of yours, recently! :-P :-)
> This guy is always good for a surprise. :-))

Hehe :-)
Of course, it was meant as a joke, but it even would have been funnier 
when you knew about that already ;-P

> > that it has some 
> > problems with some CDs - I happen to own such a thing :-)
> > (the AmigaOS 3.9 CD, if somebody cares :-))
> Have you analyzed the problem=3D3F
> I bet, it's just another unforeseeable standard deviation. Or even 
> more 
> confusing, standard compliance. ;-)

No, I haven't analyzed it at all - but my multi-session fs is really 
"simple" in that regard: it just always using absolute addressing.
That works fine as long as there are not do independent ISO-9660 
sessions on that disk, and I guess that's the case with it. Since I 
would need to be able to differentiate between a multi-session, and a 
single session, I was just too lazy to think about it, after scanning 
through the standard :-)
(as it works for almost every disk)

Unfortunately, it even enters KDL with that CD, IIRC - so it's really 
something that should be fixed.

Adios...
   Axel.