Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote:

> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > > No, I haven't analyzed it at all - but my multi-session fs is
> > > really
> > > "simple" in that regard: it just always using absolute addressing.
> > > That works fine as long as there are not do independent ISO-9660
> > > sessions on that disk, and I guess that's the case with it. Since I
> > > would need to be able to differentiate between a multi-session, and
> > > a
> > > single session, I was just too lazy to think about it, after
> > > scanning
> > > through the standard :-)
> > > (as it works for almost every disk)
> > I wonder, if that disk is perhaps indeed standard compliant. That
> > would
> > at least explain, why it fails when being accessed with (non-
> > standard)
> > absolute addressing.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I think - I haven't doubted for a second that
> it's my fault :-)

I actually didn't intend to imply that. :-)

> > > Unfortunately, it even enters KDL with that CD, IIRC - so it's
> > > really
> > > something that should be fixed.
> > I would be interested to have a look at it. Maybe you want to bring
> > it
> > to the next BeGeistert=3D3F!
>
> Funny that you mention it, because I forgot to ask it in the last mail
> :)
> I am looking forward to meet you there!

So do I. :-)

CU, Ingo